×
Retirement and forum shutdown (17 Jan 2022)

Hi,

John Howell who has managed the forum for years is getting on and wishes to retire from the role of managing it.
Over the years, he has managed the forum through good days and bad days and he has always been fair.
He has managed to bring his passion for fish keeping to the forum and keep it going for so long.

I wish to thank John for his hard work in keeping the forum going.

With John wishing to "retire" from the role of managing the forum and the forum receiving very little traffic, I think we must agree that forum has come to a natural conclusion and it's time to put it to rest.

I am proposing that the forum be made read-only from March 2022 onwards and that no new users or content be created. The website is still registered for several more years, so the content will still be accessible but no new topics or replies will be allowed.

If there is interest from the ITFS or other fish keeping clubs, we may redirect traffic to them or to a Facebook group but will not actively manage it.

I'd like to thank everyone over the years who helped with forum, posted a reply, started a new topic, ask a question and helped a newbie in fish keeping. And thank you to the sponsors who helped us along the away. Hopefully it made the hobby stronger.

I'd especially like to thank John Howell and Valerie Rousseau for all of their contributions, without them the forum would have never been has successful.

Thank you
Darragh Sherwin

UV or not UV or maybe 50 50

More
29 Jul 2010 01:03 - 29 Jul 2010 01:04 #1 by Ma (mm mm)
Hi,


I havve read some discussions on UV for freshies, pros and cons with no definitive answer as to what is really best.

SO.. I want to cut my hosing on t intake, connect to each end a Y fitting or T fitting, connect a UV to one side of the T and attach to other end, and on other side just use hosing to complete the connection, which I thnk will leave me with 50% of intake going through the UV and 50% going through the othe side un filtered. Would this do you reckon reduce but not completely wipe out bacteria?

I am going all out on the 450 Pleco Loach seeing as I only have one tank to maintain.


Cheers
Mark

yes I am full of questions this morning:)

Location D.11
Last edit: 29 Jul 2010 01:04 by Ma (mm mm).

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
29 Jul 2010 01:09 #2 by JohnH (John)
I think that one's best left to someone with more technical knowledge than I.
Does exposure to UV light kill off bacteria? I really would like to know that too.

John

Location:
N. Tipp

We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl - year after year.


ITFS member.



It's a long way to Tipperary.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
29 Jul 2010 01:24 #3 by dyco619 (steve carmody)
the phrase "if its not broke dont fix it" springs to mind! no offence, but im sure your set up works perfectly well without it?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
29 Jul 2010 07:16 #4 by dar (darren curry)
i'd have to ask how many fish have you lost due a lack of uv? many a fish keeper experienced or not have kept fish healthy for many years without such new fangled contraptions

Check out the angling section, it is fantastic

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
29 Jul 2010 07:54 #5 by Gavin (Gavin)
u.v doesn't kill bacteria. It's really used mainly to kill free floating spores algae. Since your bacteria cover everything n the tank decor etc they would be unharmed. we use u.v on all they sytems here and have no problems at all.

dont make me come over there.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
29 Jul 2010 08:29 #6 by Viperbot (Jason Hughes)
Im using a sterillizer in my marine tank and have noticed a drop in algae, pretty substantial actually. It wouldnt do you any harm to use one but they are not an essential piece of kit.

Jay

Location: Finglas, North Dublin.

Life
may not be the party we hoped for, but while we
are here we might as well dance.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
29 Jul 2010 09:44 #7 by igmillichip (ian millichip)
I gather we're talking about the aquarium UV stuff rather than UV light in general.

Some of the tubes used in aquarium filters are not really powerful enough to do any real sterilising. But they clean up algae.

More powerful high-energy wavelenghts will sterlise rather well.....but it isn't simply a matter of attaching a UV lamp to any old filter system.
The water flow needs to be quite slow and close to the tube.
There is a potential for a noticable amount of ozone production.
There is a potential for making a chemical reaction chamber where 'unknown' reactions may be calalysted by the UV.

So, all in all, it's good for algae, but if you need to sterilise then that is a more serious piece of kit (and probably questionable if anyone actually needs that power in fish tank).

Irish Tropical Fish Society (ITFS) Member.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
29 Jul 2010 11:17 #8 by Ma (mm mm)
Thank you Gentlemen.

I was having a read about and got caught between as Ian mentioned, aquarium UV and sterilizing and wanted to end up somewhere in the middle. If it aint broke, I thnk workes for me. I don't have any algae issues and never had in this tank, not even one fish death since it has been set up, even with serious damage to my Bala Shark he pulled through with no infection.

I think then maybe the salt content is performing this somewhat already.

Thanks a mil, now I won't go wasting my time and money doing this.


Mark B)

Location D.11

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.047 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum