×
Retirement and forum shutdown (17 Jan 2022)

Hi,

John Howell who has managed the forum for years is getting on and wishes to retire from the role of managing it.
Over the years, he has managed the forum through good days and bad days and he has always been fair.
He has managed to bring his passion for fish keeping to the forum and keep it going for so long.

I wish to thank John for his hard work in keeping the forum going.

With John wishing to "retire" from the role of managing the forum and the forum receiving very little traffic, I think we must agree that forum has come to a natural conclusion and it's time to put it to rest.

I am proposing that the forum be made read-only from March 2022 onwards and that no new users or content be created. The website is still registered for several more years, so the content will still be accessible but no new topics or replies will be allowed.

If there is interest from the ITFS or other fish keeping clubs, we may redirect traffic to them or to a Facebook group but will not actively manage it.

I'd like to thank everyone over the years who helped with forum, posted a reply, started a new topic, ask a question and helped a newbie in fish keeping. And thank you to the sponsors who helped us along the away. Hopefully it made the hobby stronger.

I'd especially like to thank John Howell and Valerie Rousseau for all of their contributions, without them the forum would have never been has successful.

Thank you
Darragh Sherwin

Juwel Filter

More
16 Mar 2010 23:08 #1 by DJK (David Kinsella)
I have been reading alot of posts recently about the Juwel internal filtration system and its so called faults and inefficiency's. IMO there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. I would hate to suggest a small piece of snobbery.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
16 Mar 2010 23:26 #2 by Viperbot (Jason Hughes)
In my experience the filters supplied with the Juwel tanks are mediocre at best. I found that a lot of detritus can collect in the bottom of the box and the pump in the Vision I had wasnt the best either. I thought it was a bit under powered for the amount of media it was pulling water through. Also, they take up a lot of room in the aquarium. This may well have just been a bad experience on my part but if I hadnt sold it I would have removed the box filter and replaced it with an external.

Jay

Location: Finglas, North Dublin.

Life
may not be the party we hoped for, but while we
are here we might as well dance.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
16 Mar 2010 23:51 #3 by Dioza (Adam Bell)
Replied by Dioza (Adam Bell) on topic Re:Juwel Filter
I found the heater in the box wasn't getting my 180L up to temperature. I took it out of the box and it worked fine. I also found like Jay the power head seemed a bit underpowered for what it had to do. I ripped the lot out and now run a an external on it.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
17 Mar 2010 09:26 #4 by gerryberry (Jeff Daly)
For me it was the valuable tank space the filter box took up that made me decide to rip it out, also dependant on what fish you keep it was just not up to the job and the pumps are under rated.
On the positive side i loved my jewel tank, well built units but an external is the way to go.

Jeff

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • eire1978 (eire1978)
  • eire1978 (eire1978)'s Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
17 Mar 2010 10:32 #5 by eire1978 (eire1978)
Replied by eire1978 (eire1978) on topic Re:Juwel Filter
i like the juwel filter filter u can get a bigger pump and change the sponges get rid of carbon and green sponges put in blue ones and cover with real plants

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
17 Mar 2010 10:56 #6 by Acara (Dave Walters)
They are great for the smaller range of tanks,I have yet to see an internal filter that would come anywhere near the media capacity on the Rekord70 for example.And in my opinion,they are neater looking in that instance than an added internal,also the benefit of having the heater hidden and removing the risk of fish being burnt.
On the bigger tanks,however,you can't go wrong by adding a good external.I would always advise using the lesser rating on any filter,eg if it's recomended rating is 100-250ltr,I wouldn't stick it in a tank much over 120ltrs.
They do have some problems as mentioned in thread already,but a small amopunt of time spent on maintenance can remedy most problems.

always on the lookout for interesting corys.pm me if you know off any!

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
17 Mar 2010 11:02 #7 by Fishowner (Gavin fishowner)
There isnt anything wrong with the in terms of their use however as mentioned they do take up alot of tank space. Similarly if you were to follow the instructions to the tee then you will be back and forth buying jewels products to keep the filter operating but there are ways around that also if you break away from the Jewel handbook!!
Despite that, as Acara mentioned in his post,for larger tanks an external is the way to go and similarly always size down re the rating of the size of the tank it will work for. I think this goes for any filter to be honest.
I dont think there is snobbery in any way with these filters,the majority of people though prefer an external filter on larger tanks and hence the taking out of the box!
Gavin

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
17 Mar 2010 12:45 #8 by sheag35 (Seamus Gillespie)
I have to agree with acara on this they are fine for your standard set up, but again it depends on your set up if malawis where kept or larger cichlids i've found from experience they couldnt cope well with the amount or crap in the tank, yet i use one in my Lamp multifasiatus breeding set up and it performs admirably, but it seems small fish small filter, big fish imo need an external (which also frees up more tank space for more fish)

Fishkeeping the Only way to get wet and wild

currently 25 tanks, and breeding is the aim of everything i keep
location:Limerick

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.046 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum