Retirement and forum shutdown (17 Jan 2022)
Hi,
John Howell who has managed the forum for years is getting on and wishes to retire from the role of managing it.
Over the years, he has managed the forum through good days and bad days and he has always been fair.
He has managed to bring his passion for fish keeping to the forum and keep it going for so long.
I wish to thank John for his hard work in keeping the forum going.
With John wishing to "retire" from the role of managing the forum and the forum receiving very little traffic, I think we must agree that forum has come to a natural conclusion and it's time to put it to rest.
I am proposing that the forum be made read-only from March 2022 onwards and that no new users or content be created. The website is still registered for several more years, so the content will still be accessible but no new topics or replies will be allowed.
If there is interest from the ITFS or other fish keeping clubs, we may redirect traffic to them or to a Facebook group but will not actively manage it.
I'd like to thank everyone over the years who helped with forum, posted a reply, started a new topic, ask a question and helped a newbie in fish keeping. And thank you to the sponsors who helped us along the away. Hopefully it made the hobby stronger.
I'd especially like to thank John Howell and Valerie Rousseau for all of their contributions, without them the forum would have never been has successful.
Thank you
Darragh Sherwin
automatic lock
- joey (joe watson)
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 673
- Thank you received: 36
Location: Portlaoise, Midlands
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- andrewo (andrew)
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 742
- Thank you received: 51

Please Log in to join the conversation.
- DJK (David Kinsella)
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 330
- Thank you received: 21
whatsoever from my experience.
If for example a poster wanted to update the development of his/her tank after a gap of say 3 months and that he/she would then have to get permission from admin, may just put them off due to the hassle involved.
I wouldn't get too bothered from the recent rare incidents and quote.
I've 'lurked' around the forum recently and i'm looking forward to utilizing and perhaps humbly contributing to the wealth of knowlage here on the forum.
Dave
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- dar (darren curry)
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1539
- Thank you received: 17
Check out the angling section, it is fantastic
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- joey (joe watson)
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 673
- Thank you received: 36
and i never thought about the progress update dave (even though i'll be doing this myself over time)
yes andrew it does look like there's an agenda behind digging up old posts. my guess is the acrchives weren't searched but a problem was googled and that thread came up as a hit.
personally i hate old topics being resurrected (not including the tank updates), you think its all finished and answered and done to death, then someone digs it with a pointless or already-posted-just-worded-differently post. or to take a stab at someone. old topics, IMO, are old because they have been fully answered or the problem/issue/reason for posting has been fixed/elapsed so they are very useful as reference, and we should otherwise let sleeping dogs lie
Location: Portlaoise, Midlands
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- andrewo (andrew)
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 742
- Thank you received: 51

Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Puddlefish (Colin McCourt)
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 347
- Thank you received: 10
I, like others before me, have written many a good article on various topical matter only to see them plunge to the murky depths and probably never see the light of day again but for being resurrected every now and then.
I am still waiting for them (my posts) to be moved to the article section so as they can be enjoyed and utilised by one and all instead of being lost in the quagmire. The longer this practice goes on then the more information will be lost.
Maybe John could move some of them.
Regards
C
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- joey (joe watson)
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 673
- Thank you received: 36
i really dont envy his job...
but after reading ye'rs opinions, surely it could be good to have any replys to threads over x months old to go thru a proofing stage basically to stop repeats of recent events and also to stop alot of pointless posts, so it is therefore up to admin/mods to deem reply's useful to the topic or not
Location: Portlaoise, Midlands
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Puddlefish (Colin McCourt)
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 347
- Thank you received: 10
John will not be, or shouldn't be, the only active moderator on here, so there are in all likelihood a selection of folks that have the authority to be sorting things out....otherwise and if the situation predicts then the powers that be should be looking to co-opt new moderators or help teams to collectively deal with the tasks in hand.
Regards
C
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- joey (joe watson)
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 673
- Thank you received: 36
Location: Portlaoise, Midlands
Please Log in to join the conversation.