×
Retirement and forum shutdown (17 Jan 2022)

Hi,

John Howell who has managed the forum for years is getting on and wishes to retire from the role of managing it.
Over the years, he has managed the forum through good days and bad days and he has always been fair.
He has managed to bring his passion for fish keeping to the forum and keep it going for so long.

I wish to thank John for his hard work in keeping the forum going.

With John wishing to "retire" from the role of managing the forum and the forum receiving very little traffic, I think we must agree that forum has come to a natural conclusion and it's time to put it to rest.

I am proposing that the forum be made read-only from March 2022 onwards and that no new users or content be created. The website is still registered for several more years, so the content will still be accessible but no new topics or replies will be allowed.

If there is interest from the ITFS or other fish keeping clubs, we may redirect traffic to them or to a Facebook group but will not actively manage it.

I'd like to thank everyone over the years who helped with forum, posted a reply, started a new topic, ask a question and helped a newbie in fish keeping. And thank you to the sponsors who helped us along the away. Hopefully it made the hobby stronger.

I'd especially like to thank John Howell and Valerie Rousseau for all of their contributions, without them the forum would have never been has successful.

Thank you
Darragh Sherwin

fluval 304 enough?

More
09 Apr 2007 03:35 #1 by lampeye (lampeye)
im setting up a new tang tank in my rio 180. stocking will be:
-6 small calvis
-occelatus shell dwellers
-maybe 10 leptisoma

heres my question. i want to take out the juwel box, will the 304 be good enough on it s own?

lampeye

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
09 Apr 2007 09:23 #2 by Pablo (Pablo -)
204 or 304???.... I got a 305 in my Trigon 190 and works really well... so if you said 304 should be fine a 204 will probably will be little bit weak...

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Didihno (Didihno)
  • Didihno (Didihno)'s Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
10 Apr 2007 04:50 #3 by Didihno (Didihno)
Replied by Didihno (Didihno) on topic Re: fluval 304 enough?
The 304 will suffice, as the numbers on the spec says it will.
(check the Fluval site for specs)
I like to overfilter my tanks however.
In my Rio 240 for example I have two Fluval 304's running.
Thats about 1.5 times the spec.
Its a great little filter.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • apistodiscus (apistodiscus)
  • apistodiscus (apistodiscus)'s Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
10 Apr 2007 06:23 #4 by apistodiscus (apistodiscus)
Replied by apistodiscus (apistodiscus) on topic Re: fluval 304 enough?
The filter itself does the job, however, the way it is sealed is pure cr*p. After a while you will find that the clips are a pain to close and you will need several attempts to seal the filter properly. Messy and time-consuming. I am not the only one who had this problem. I think Russel was in the same boat. The tubes supplied are also not standard. So if you want to fit an in-line heater you will also find yourself in trouble. Try to buy a filter with four clips (1 in each corner).

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
10 Apr 2007 06:56 #5 by KenS (Ken Simpson)
I have the 305 and have found it to be fine. However, I fitted an inline UV steriliser and the ribbed tubes are a real pain to seal properly. Not sure I'll go for another fluval based on the tubing alone.

Regards,

Ken.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Didihno (Didihno)
  • Didihno (Didihno)'s Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
11 Apr 2007 02:12 #6 by Didihno (Didihno)
Replied by Didihno (Didihno) on topic Re: fluval 304 enough?
I got mixed up there, I was describing the Fluval 3+ internal filter, not the external 304, which I have no experience with.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.041 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum