Retirement and forum shutdown (17 Jan 2022)
Hi,
John Howell who has managed the forum for years is getting on and wishes to retire from the role of managing it.
Over the years, he has managed the forum through good days and bad days and he has always been fair.
He has managed to bring his passion for fish keeping to the forum and keep it going for so long.
I wish to thank John for his hard work in keeping the forum going.
With John wishing to "retire" from the role of managing the forum and the forum receiving very little traffic, I think we must agree that forum has come to a natural conclusion and it's time to put it to rest.
I am proposing that the forum be made read-only from March 2022 onwards and that no new users or content be created. The website is still registered for several more years, so the content will still be accessible but no new topics or replies will be allowed.
If there is interest from the ITFS or other fish keeping clubs, we may redirect traffic to them or to a Facebook group but will not actively manage it.
I'd like to thank everyone over the years who helped with forum, posted a reply, started a new topic, ask a question and helped a newbie in fish keeping. And thank you to the sponsors who helped us along the away. Hopefully it made the hobby stronger.
I'd especially like to thank John Howell and Valerie Rousseau for all of their contributions, without them the forum would have never been has successful.
Thank you
Darragh Sherwin
ammonium or ammonia spike
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- JohnH (John)
- Offline
- Administrator
- Posts: 6067
- Thank you received: 857
Wheres Ian in this hour of need : )
I've sent a message to Ian telling him his advice is being specifically requested, hopefully he'll see it in the morning and respond.
John
Location:
N. Tipp
We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl - year after year.
ITFS member.
It's a long way to Tipperary.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- igmillichip (ian millichip)
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 3366
- Thank you received: 536
Ammonia Calculation Article
Ammonia is a weak base.........and its salt is ammonium.
Ammonium is a weak acid.
It is not a simple matter of ammonia being turned to ammonium at pHs below 7; just like it is not a simple matter of ammonia existing as ammonia at pHs above 7.
In fact, pH 7 is not a particularly important pH at for ammonia/ammonium: and so nothing especially important happens around that pH.
A more important pH for ammonia (at standard temp and pressure) would be pH 9.25.
Why is pH 9.25 important?..................... well, at pH 9.25 (well there abouts), total ammonia will exist as 50% ammonia (unionised ammonia = UA)) and 50% ammonium.
When the pH goes below 9.25 then the % of ammonium will start to increase and the % of ammonia (UA) will decrease (but not in a linear manner). It does not suddenly jump from 50% ammonia to 0% as soon as the pH becomes more acidic than pH 9.25.
Even at pH 8, at 25 Celcius, the UA ammonia will only be 1/20th (5%) of the total ammonia (total ammonia = UA ammonia plus ammonium).
If we go to pH 10 then you find (at 25 C) that the Unionised ammonia is 85% of the total ammonia.
Now, if you are using a Total Ammonia test kit then the calculations in the linked article are important.............. ie if your total ammonia is 0.25ppm at pH 8 and 25C then your unionised ammonia is going to be 5% of that (~0.013 ppm).
Looking at ammonia/ammonium............. it is an equilibrium system.
At any pH (and to a less extend, temperature) you will have x% of ammonia and y% of ammonium.
The ratio of ammonia to ammonium at the pH and temp will always try to be the same (they WILL be).
So, if something takes q amount of ammonia from the water then the equilibrium will shift such that a small amount of ammonium will be converted to ammonia so that we still have x% ammonia and y% ammonium.
Now, if you add a very small amount of ammonia to your tank (eg from a bottle) then the system will shift such that an amount of the ammonia is converted (spontaneously) to ammonium thereby keeping our x% ammonia and y% ammonium.
This is all about themodynamics and Le Chatelier's principle
Similarly, when ammonia or ammonium are being part of a biochemical reaction within a cell then the same thermodynamic principle will apply (albeit with enzymic control).
But when we look at thermodynamics within a cell then things do get even more complex as living organisms are great at doing some special chemistry.
When it comes to toxicity you have to be very careful in looking at what is being said......
ammonium is far less toxic than ammonia.
I would say that the toxicity of ammonia has been a major factor in the evolution of many animals, and a key item in the move from water to land (for land animals)..... it is not just a fish thing.
I have found (as have other scientists) that ammonia is more toxic at lower pH than it is at higher pH.............. but for a given amount of total ammonia, there is less ammonia at low pH (hence why people mistakingly believe that ammonia is less toxic at low pH...........whereas what they are seeing is simply less ammonia).
I will leave off there for now............and see if there are any questions.
This is a very complex subject.............. and that is the reason I hate the word "cycled" (as it is totally meaningless in a fish tank).
ian
Irish Tropical Fish Society (ITFS) Member.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- robert (robert carter)
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1689
- Thank you received: 113
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
I,m very surprised i have had no fish loss and they look very healthy,maybe the fact that i run a vigorous airstone 24/7 helped to keep a certain amount of bacteria alive in the aquarium even though they would have died off in the external filter,cheers ....
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- robert (robert carter)
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1689
- Thank you received: 113
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- robert (robert carter)
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1689
- Thank you received: 113
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
The lay out of the filter media postions in the e1501 is wrong according to the pond guru especially when using biohome media,i recieved an email back from him a while back explaining why.With the water coming from the top sides to the bottom and up through the middle through the baskets on exit the bottom tray should have sponges,fine,medium and coarse,this is to trap the mulm first so preventing it from clogging the biohome media in the basket above to be effecive.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- igmillichip (ian millichip)
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 3366
- Thank you received: 536
You may find that amount of free unionised ammonia (NH3) levels may be low due to the pH and the equilibrium thingy I was talking about above [....and .......just noticed that the forum has a sub-script functions now.............that is really useful]
I am absolutely not a supporter of the use of a side-effect of some water conditioner for temporarily locking ammonia out of "harms way".
SeaChem Prime is a rather good dechlorinator that happens to "lock" ammonia for a reasonably long time [many other water conditioners either don't do that at all or lock the ammonia for a much shorter time].
However, I do not feel that Prime should be used for that side-effect.
The principle of using Prime to "remove" ammonia is not actually to remove ammonia but to lock ammonia out of harms way whilst processes can act on the ammonia to convert it to less harmful chemicals (eg to nitrites by nitrosofication).
But, note, that is assuming that you have the appropriate microbial colonies active in your tank !!
I am, however, a big supporter of having an emergency supply of solid-phase removal agents in cases of emergency.
Such solid-phase things include ammonia adsorbing zeolites or nitrate adsorbing resins etc
(and PolyFilter).
There are a number of products on the market.
Now, nitrates should never to be taken to zero........... to do so is increasing the risk of proliferation of sulphur reducing bacteria in anoxic areas of the tank.
Reduction of sulphur can release Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S)........... extremely toxic.
So.....if using powerful nitrate removers such as JBL NitraEx, take care to use it until the nitrate is lowered to a reasonable level.
Now, these are emergency measures................ and will not beat the harmony of natural processes within a reasonably mature tank.
On a bigger note, as the original question was teetering on the edge of academic stuff, the nitrogen cycle in real life is way more complex than that awful and incorrect notion of what has been in recent times called a "cycle".
Nature would not be so silly as to have a one way line and call it a "cycle" !!
Many "unexplained" fish still alive scenarios may be well explained by looking at the nitrogen cycle as it really happens or looking at the real biochemistry/biophysics/physiology of fish.
Similarly, many "unexplained" wipes out may well be due to natural things happening within the nitrogen cycle within a tank that so happen to be not what a fish keeper wants............but can still happen eg nitrates being converted to nitrites or ammonia !!
Nature is pretty tought but also so fragile.
BioHome balls....I have not used them.
ian
Irish Tropical Fish Society (ITFS) Member.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- robert (robert carter)
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1689
- Thank you received: 113
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
I was totally flummoxed when i read in your post......QUOTE ..Similarly, many "unexplained" wipes out may well be due to natural things happening within the nitrogen cycle within a tank that so happen to be not what a fish keeper wants............but can still happen eg nitrates being converted to nitrites or ammonia !! UNQUOTE .. I have never heard of this before and i would say a lot of others too
that Nitrates can be converted back,very interesting indeed,cheers..
p.s i forgot to leave the link for the bacteria balls and the filter media that they claim is the best on the market since sliced bread. filterpro.co.uk/bacteria-5-c.asp
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- robert (robert carter)
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1689
- Thank you received: 113
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
QUOTE...Now, nitrates should never to be taken to zero........... to do so is increasing the risk of proliferation of sulphur reducing bacteria in anoxic areas of the tank.
Reduction of sulphur can release Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S)........... extremely toxic.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- igmillichip (ian millichip)
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 3366
- Thank you received: 536
If something is oxidised then something must be reduced.
(it is all to do with donating and receiving electrons......... and that could also include loss or gain of oxygen or loss or gain of hydrogen: but I am an electron man !! ).
Nitrites are an example of a product from the oxidation of ammonia; Nitrogen gas is also a product from the oxidation of ammonia: and both of these can happen in a fish tank under the right conditions.
Now, those processes can go in reverse.
If we reduce (remember I'm talking chemistry here) nitrogen gas we can get ammonia; and if we reduce nitrites we could also get ammonia (as just one example of a product of nitrite reduction).
So....now let's look at nitrates:
Nitrogen gas is one product of nitrate reduction (we see in denitrification for example); nitrite is also a product of nitrate reduction; and ammonia can be a product of nitrate reduction: all of these can happen in the fish tank under given conditions.
Note... these are not the only products of reduction or oxidation.
One of the most common examples of nitrate reduction fish keepers see is in doing common Nitrate Tests.
Nearlly all (if not all) off the shelf wet Nitrate test kits are actually low accuracy Nitrite Test kits !!!
Within the common test kits you need to first reduce (remember.... this is chemistry talk) the nitrate produce nitrites within the test tube [usually Zinc is used as the reducing agent].
When the nitrates have been reduced to nitrite then the second part of the common test kits will measure the nitrites with a colour complex.
Magic.....??..... but wait...... that means nitrates can be converted to nitrites.........and then onto being converted to ammonia.
That can happen in your fish tank............and that can be helped by bacteria under certain conditions.
There are other products along the way in this oxidation/reduction (RedOx) system between ammonia and nitrates.
RedOx potentials comes into all of this.
Now, I said that nitrate test kits are pretty inaccurate nitrite test kits.........so a zero reading may not actually be zero.
And, a nitrate test does not need to be overly accurate or sensitive..........because they are usually nitrite test kits.
OK.............so what about zero nitrate?
well, I mean zero nitrate as opposed to 4ppm but reading as zero on a cheap test kit.
The next bit will be very rough "smoothed over" science as I want to get to an important point without the detail......
In anoxic areas of your fish tank, certain aerobic bacteria (these are not anaerobic bacteria but facultative anaerobes) can convert nitrates to nitrogen gas (=denitrification)..... these are nitrate reducing bacteria.
Now, in competition with those are anaerobic sulphur reducing bacteria.
These reduce sulphur to form Hydrogen Sulphide.
You will have sulphurous compounds in your tank as normal...........so that is the source of the sulphur.
Often, the nitrate reducing bacteria can out compete the sulphur reducing bacteria.....thereby lowering the potential for the output of hydrogen sulphide.
However, if nitrates become so low that nitrate reducing bacteria die off then hydrogen sulphide producing bacteria may start to proliferate. That is not good.
ian
Irish Tropical Fish Society (ITFS) Member.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- robert (robert carter)
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1689
- Thank you received: 113
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- igmillichip (ian millichip)
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 3366
- Thank you received: 536
Many media can do that............... some are specially made to be very good at providing the anoxic environment whilst allowing water movement through it. Maybe that what the media is that you talk about.
I did loads of work in the 70s and 80s on filter design to minimise or stop the need for water changes especially in marine tanks by removing nitrates from the water.
Yes....I had some really great systems built that could easily remove nitrates........... but I found that the lack of water changes was not great on the quality of the fish.
I presently use some even more sophisticated filtration system based upon sludge........but they have to be very very mature systems.
In some of my systems I have ammonia oxidised directly to nitrogen gas (there is no nitrites/nitrates etc etc involved).
But, I still like to do water changes.
Nomad.......... I would like to see the source of the quote.
Nitrate is a highly soluble form of nitrogen............so I don't know how it would need to be processed into an even more soluble form.
ian
Irish Tropical Fish Society (ITFS) Member.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- robert (robert carter)
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1689
- Thank you received: 113
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- igmillichip (ian millichip)
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 3366
- Thank you received: 536
For most plants is not not a great idea to force the plant into using nitrates as a nitrogen source as that compromises their energy efficiency.
But, as with anything in nature.........there are always a few exceptions.
Such exceptions are water-plantain or species of shoreweed (Littorella) that I have come across.
Most aquatic plants that I know of prefer ammonium as their nitrogen source; and would only utilise nitrates if nitrates were the only nitrogen source available.
That means that plants are an important part of the nitrogen cycle from the stand point of ammonia/ammonium removal from the water more so than removing nitrates.
However, things are never simple in real life............ you can't just think that high amounts of ammonium/ammonia are good for plants: high ammonia/ammonium is very bad for plants.........and the roots are especially sensitive to ammonium/ammonia.
I won't, yet, start talking about chemicals such as ammonium nitrate !!!
ian
Irish Tropical Fish Society (ITFS) Member.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- igmillichip (ian millichip)
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 3366
- Thank you received: 536
In recent times, I have seen more and more incorrect writings on the subject appear within fish keeping literature.............. and the worse bit about some of it is that it claims to be "recent, and therefore correct" (sic) !!
For links below.......I have an Athens account, so I see some of the full articles on these links......... but the abstracts are good enough where only an abstract is available to people without the appropriate journal account:
www.jstor.org/stable/23367904?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
.............
www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/an....pp.32.060181.001125
.....................................
This is a nice paper..
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2803002/
.......................................
From about page 300 onwards (esp 313 onwards)
books.google.ie/books?id=-I7pCAAAQBAJ&pr...#v=onepage&q&f=false
........................
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304377082900468
.............................
A full paper PDF (just the intro will do on this)
www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/solsa/Floresetal.pdf
Just a few to be getting on with.
ian
Irish Tropical Fish Society (ITFS) Member.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- igmillichip (ian millichip)
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 3366
- Thank you received: 536
A couple of match sticks and a bucket of coffee should do the trick to get through all those links .....
Food for thought when you have nothing to do.
This has been a nice thread to chat on, by the way.
It's good having these types of discussions.
ian
Irish Tropical Fish Society (ITFS) Member.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- nomad (pat murphy)
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 340
- Thank you received: 17
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- robert (robert carter)
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1689
- Thank you received: 113
Please Log in to join the conversation.